Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Should universities require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study? Although the implementation of the policy promises some benefits for alumnae and for society as a whole, I disagree with the policy due to the fact that overall level of quality of students' preparation might decrease due to the fact that additional time ought to be devoted to a variety of outside courses.
To begin with, the proposed policy has many supporters, in particular, because it embodies the dream of enlightenment - creation of truly educated person. From this viewpoint, a graduate student ought to have knowledge in many fields from math and physics to humanitarian sciences such as literature and history and even the arts. Those highly educated person will manage to improve society be more responsible in his or her actions and decisions. In other words, the fulfillment of the policy may speed up social development and alleviate existing problems, however, is this policy has no drawbacks?
The answer on this question is "no" due to the fact that not all students have equal inclinations and motivation to studying, especially, courses which have not explicit connection with future job. Consequently, mechanical implementation of the policy may lead to the situation when students neglect the courses outside their major field of studying. For example, a person who pursues degree in engineering may decide that there is no use for him in studying, for instance, history or biology. In the same vein, a student who is going to be a musician and plays violin may dismiss physics as a subject which seems to be useless for his future occupation. In this case, the proposed policy will not bring expected results.
Furthermore, the likeliness exists that the policy may have a negative impact on level of students' preparation because the amount of time devoted on studying will, probably, remain the same; therefore, time which otherwise will be allotted to major subjects will be re-distributed to courses outside the main field. In this case, a surgeon may learn less about physiology and anatomy but more about astronomy. Moreover, some of students are gifted and have a strong inclination to a certain scientific field; the implementation of the policy may distract those prodigies from their endeavor. For example, imagine that for instant, Mozart would have been forced to study math and biology instead of creating his wonderful masterpieces, today some other talented students in chemistry and other subjects may be distracted from their work.
In conclusion, although the proposed policy has many proponents who believe that this policy may bring benefits to society, I strongly aver that the policy may not only be useless but even harmful for us due to the reasons mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 421, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the students') or simply say ''some students''.
Suggestion: some of the students; some students
...omy but more about astronomy. Moreover, some of students are gifted and have a strong inclinatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'in particular', 'of course', 'such as', 'in other words', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.249019607843 0.240241500013 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.137254901961 0.157235817809 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0843137254902 0.0880659088768 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0392156862745 0.0497285424764 79% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0235294117647 0.0444667217837 53% => OK
Prepositions: 0.13137254902 0.12292977631 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0411764705882 0.0406280797675 101% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85755407895 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0392156862745 0.030933414821 127% => OK
Particles: 0.00196078431373 0.0016655270985 118% => OK
Determiners: 0.109803921569 0.0997080785238 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0392156862745 0.0249443105267 157% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0137254901961 0.0148568991511 92% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2836.0 2732.02544248 104% => OK
No of words: 459.0 452.878318584 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.17864923747 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.400871459695 0.366273622748 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.315904139434 0.280924506359 112% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.217864923747 0.200843997647 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.119825708061 0.132149295362 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85755407895 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 219.290929204 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490196078431 0.48968727796 100% => OK
Word variations: 55.698236266 55.4138127331 101% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 28.6875 23.380412469 123% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.0090290741 59.4972553346 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.25 141.124799967 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6875 23.380412469 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0625 0.674092028746 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 60.2779139434 51.4728631049 117% => OK
Elegance: 2.10784313725 1.64882698954 128% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448784175363 0.391690518653 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.111045237547 0.123202303941 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0759125416423 0.077325440228 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.572297682795 0.547984918172 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.182718673052 0.149214159877 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200656896185 0.161403998019 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102753959652 0.0892212321368 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.384217735867 0.385218514788 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0696994490397 0.0692045440612 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308944468627 0.275328986314 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837930936263 0.0653680567796 128% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.