Students go to a university to gain knowledge which would help them to build their future. A Computer science student does not require to understand the concept of thermodynamics to excel in his/her domain. I contend with the statement that the universities should require students to take courses only they are interested in.
If students study only the subject the are interested in, then there is high chance that they might get a good score in those subjects as they will study to gain knowledge and not to get marks. Knowledge is more important for future success than good marks. Studying specific subjects, students will have more time to focus and concentrate thoroughly on their specific field.
If a student is made to study a subject, which the student does not have interest and that subject does not belong to his/her field of study, then there is a chance that the student might fail. For instance, a computer science student is taught auto cad, a software used by mechanical engineers, and he fails in that subject. How can computer science student be measured by how well can he use auto cad when that software has no relation with the students future.
However, there are instances where some students do not know their field of interests, so to find out the University makes students study some subjects from all the courses which will help then to thoroughly find out their real interest.
In conclusion, the university should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying. Indeed, which will help the student to realise their real potential and excel in their fields.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'understanding'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: understanding
...mputer science student does not require to understand the concept of thermodynamics to excel ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
.... If students study only the subject the are interested in, then there is high chanc...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, well, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 2235.4752809 61% => OK
No of words: 276.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95652173913 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53036588714 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 215.323595506 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474637681159 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5084787754 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424601070126 0.243740707755 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194053369044 0.0831039109588 234% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.258896293877 0.0758088955206 342% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27903434185 0.150359130593 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179241196419 0.0667264976115 269% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 100.480337079 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.