Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Colleges in the United States are quite different in their educational approach than Colleges and Universities elswhere, namely in the Middle East. While the formers tend to require students to particapate in courses from a wide array of fields, and not only from their specific field of interest, the latters require students to focus their studies on one specific field from the very first day of school.
Regarding this issue, I believe that the American University system is more beneficial due to it's ability to broaden the point of view of students and widen their overall general knowledge. Since studies show that the extent of general knowledge amongst the younger generation is quite less impressive than that of their parents, this positive outcome of the American system should be regarded as highly important both to the students themselves, and to society as a whole.
Moreover, universities that do not implement the American system require students to choose a specific field of interest at a very young age, when they are very early in their academic and professional lives. This is quite troubling for many pupils and might result in many studying fields in which they turn out to find little to no interest. In contrast, the American system promises that each student will choose his major after careful consideration, and after experiencing a variety of options. Since the field in which a student decides to major will affect his whole life, I believe it is crucial to allow him the time and information he needs in order to make the right decision for him. Therefore, I believe that a university system that allows it's pupils to explore various subject is much better then one that does not.
Of course, such an approach has its problems. One if it's major problems is that allowing students to experience many fields of interest can be considered time consuming since they will study subjects which will be of no professional use to them in the future. Thus, such an approach might broaden their overall knowledge, but narrow their expertise in the specific field they want to major in. This is, of course, a concern that should be adrressed yet I assess that the time spent studying different fields, when looking at as oppossed to a lifelong career in a specific field, is unsignificant and thus it will not actually harm the student or his expertise substantually.
In conclusion, While many difficulties can arise from the implementation of such an educational approach, I believe that allowing students to take courses from various fields is crucial for their overall knowledge and certinity in their future profession. Due to that, I think every univerisity, worldwide, should consider adpoting such an approach.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 801, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'better than'?
Suggestion: better than
...pils to explore various subject is much better then one that does not. Of course, such a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 808, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... explore various subject is much better then one that does not. Of course, such a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, while, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 454.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06387665198 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73282693725 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477973568282 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 720.9 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.5345508281 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.266666667 118.986275619 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2666666667 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 5.21951772744 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165318248611 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577048615133 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370228695512 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969534572563 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231753704671 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.