Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In this day and age, many people have the urge to be mavricks. These people believe they have a unique idea that can change the world and thus they do the best they can in order to implement it. Nevertheless, many do not succed in doing so. One theory is that the rate of success depends on the ability of a person to take into account the opinions of others and their thoughts regarding his plans. While some believe being too relient on what others think might hurt the chances of a person to promote his ideas, I believe that in order for your ideas to succed, and for you to beome a lasting legacy, it is essiental to listen to others for several reasons.
Firstly, I believe that listening to others concerns is an esiental part of reshaping your idea in order to make it better. It is true that we might, at first, feel criticism is ment to hurt us and make us dissbelieve in ourselves and in our ideas, but in most cases criticism is ment to help us. Without it, it would be very hard for a person to acknowledge the problems that might occur from the implementation of his idea. Therefore, I think it is crucial to be open to criticism since it helps you gain insights regarding the problems in your idea.
In addition, no idea can be implemented alone and even the most creative and talanted mavrick needs other people on his side that will help him turn his idea into reality. For example, Steve Jobs, the inventor of the iPhone, would never have succeded in actually creating the device if it weren't for the partners who worked with him. Since no one would want to work with a person who is not open to any sort of criticism, because they will feel unwanted and irrelavent, it follows that being open to such criticism is crucial in order to gain the support needed to implement an idea and become a lasting legacy.
Of course, criticism can also have negative outcomes that might hurt ones chances of becoming a legacy. For example, a person might be very hurt by one pernicous critic and thus lose confidence in himself. In such a case, a person might abstain from promoting his ideas due to personal doubts raised by various critics. Even though this is a valid concern, I believe that a person who would be hurt so badly by critics is one that does not have the qualities needed to become a legacy in the first place. Therefore, only those who would not be hurt by such critics are potential legacies and thus one who has such potential would only gain from outside criticism.
In conclusion, criticism is an essential part of the implementation of any idea and thus every person trying to promote his ideas must be open to it. Without criticism, a person might find himself with an idea full of problems and without the partners needed to turn the idea into reality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...d in actually creating the device if it werent for the partners who worked with him. S...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... have negative outcomes that might hurt ones chances of becoming a legacy. For examp...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, of course, sort of, in most cases, it is true, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 33.0505617978 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2286.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 509.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49115913556 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39121852912 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.428290766208 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 728.1 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8383673845 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.315789474 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7894736842 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3684210526 5.21951772744 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166577152254 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582609785194 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361900175933 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10296055548 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189236911904 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 48.8420337079 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 12.1639044944 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.