Many people declare that things tend to become more complicated and mysterious when we obtain more associated knowledge. Considering the huge amount of knowledge around the world, it seems that the proposed thought is reasonable at first glance. However, I cannot entirely accept the above statement after further consideration as follows. First of all, we cannot receive and understand all the principle of our world and scientific theories because of the lack of enough knowledge. In that case, it is undoubted that we would bump into increasing challenges after addressing old issues. An appropriate example cannot be far away: In 12-th century, people were willing to believe that the center of our universe was Earth, and the sun was moving around Earth, just like moon. Nonetheless, the canny scientists proved that the corrected theory was right that Earth was moved around sun, and we were far from the center of our solar system. Furthermore, if we learn more knowledge in terms of world operation principle, we would find it more possible to exploit the natural resource without destorying our environment. After careful exploration for science, the probability of controling our surrounding would increase and thereby the comprehension of our world contributes to the colorful and vigorous future. Additionally, the idea of comfusing about our world and the increasing knowledge are not contradicted. Nowadays, more and more researchers find it impossible to obtain large advance in their research fields, since the related theories become too complicated to digest in a short time. By doing so, they continute to get promotion in high-tech areas, but cause more innovative questions and challenges in front of them. Overall, the step of science and technology will be promoted by the exploration of latest knowledge, and it is inevitable to face the coming unknown troubles. But I do believe that the solving of various difficults and handicap is the core interest of all scientists.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1809, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...ogy will be promoted by the exploration of latest knowledge, and it is inevitable to face...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 318.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27672955975 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90718465832 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591194968553 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.075053797 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.857142857 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.97078651685 20% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166419649663 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568417511045 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643631264027 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166419649663 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.