Nowadays the knowledge are developed. So that some people argue that the difficulty of studying something also increase, so that the things became more complex and mysterious. However, the increase of the knowledge helps the understanding.
It is true that the development of the knowledge causes the increase of the difficulty for the scholars to understand the world and self. Because the advance of the related knowledge aggrandizes the scope of the field and requires the preciseness. For example in field of the astronomy, the scope of their studies were limited to the range available for their eyes. But with the development of the knowledge of technology, the scope that the scholars can deal with is enhanced. Moreover, the psychologist were asked to be concentrate on their rumination on the self in the past. However, with the development of the experimental knowledge, the psychologists need to be more precise approaches nowadays.
However, the increase of the difficulty does not denote the increase of the mysteriousness. In fact, the difficulty is not the hinderance of the knowledge, but the booster of the advance in knowledge. Because by overcoming the difficulty, the scholars can expand their knowledge and make thing more comprehensible. For example, with the development of logics, the present philosophers are asked to be more precise in presenting their idea. But due to the difficulty, they can cultivate their acumen to deal with the philosophical problems.
As we have seen above, even though the development of the knowledge increase the difficulty in learning things, but the difficulty rather helps scholar to understand things in more comprehensible ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...deal with the philosophical problems. As we have seen above, even though the d...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, for example, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 267.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35580524345 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17126524088 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 215.323595506 54% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438202247191 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 446.4 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8915780988 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175733382179 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608513941709 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807770559369 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130561988752 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455816127404 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 100.480337079 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.