We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take

Essay topics:

We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position

We all have different perspective to situations in life, our perspectives are parochial by the environment we grow up in and the people around us. I do not agree with the issue because we learn new things when we engage in conversation with the people whose views contradict our own also one will be able to properly justify the reason for the position one has taken in a situation.

Legitimately, having a conversation with the people whose view you share reduces the tendency of argument. For instance, an atheist engaged in conversation with another atheist, argument about the reason they are both atheists will not come forth. Off course, other arguments might surface between them, but not for being atheist. They both share the same view and they are not contradicting each other. Notwithstanding, they have no new things to learn from each other.

However, learning is everyday activity. One might be wrong about the position one is, because of ignorance or lack of enough information. People with contradicting view enlighten on the views we fail to understand, or we lack information about.

Also, apart from the fact that we get to learn from others, we also get to teach, impact knowledge from our own point of view. Additionally, having conversation with people whose view contradict yours, you will be able to properly justify the reason for the view you have taken and refute or accept the contradicting view. For instance, a man that beliefs the earth is flat, trying to convince another man (that beliefs the earth is spherical), the latter will be able to refute immediately and add his justification with evidences and proofs. To conclude, one will be able to justify one’s position from people whose views contradict ours the one and learn new things.

Votes
Average: 6 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...al by the environment we grow up in and the people around us. I do not agree with the issue because ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... position one has taken in a situation. Legitimately, having a conversation with...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erstand, or we lack information about. Also, apart from the fact that we get to...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, apart from, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 298.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9932885906 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81364182764 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48322147651 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6631633587 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.285714286 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384740500785 0.243740707755 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140460648837 0.0831039109588 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107977721394 0.0758088955206 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244898446592 0.150359130593 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733795375334 0.0667264976115 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 100.480337079 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.