We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement attempts to bridge a relationship between our psychological trait of learning and our views. For knowing the truth we can not only rely on our own view, rather should know the other facts to provide a basis for comparing both and that is why, we learn more from people whose views we share is too much extreme statement to agree with.
When a child is born, it starts to learn from it's parents. That learning process is also greatly influenced by the surrounding culture, family, friends, religion etc. A child's first superman is his father, doing all the tasks, performing all responsibilities adroitly. That is why, children more or less hold the same view as their parents. By watching or observing the situation, a child learn and many of the time it may not question about the validity of all task. As child grows up, by observing the same wrong practice, he may believe that, that is how it should be done & that is the only way. When that type of perception is built up in his mind, he gradually confines him in a parochial view towards a problem. That is why, being with the people of same ideology, can one time limits one's view.
Additionally, continuous interaction with the people having same views, subconsciously lessen the scope of learning. As, a person holds a view and always interact with the same kind of people, there are very little scope to challenge his views, his learning. Maybe, the person is having a misconception but there is no one to correct his idea. For example, when Ptolemy stated the geocentric model, there were no one to challenge his theory and that is why for a long period, people at that time died having a false idea of earth's being the center of the universe. When Copernicus came up with his idea of heliocentric model, initially people resisted, but in the long run, it was proved that the earth moves around the sun. That legacy continued to Galileo and it was also proved that sun is not the center of the universe, rather it also rotates in it's orbit. So, a new theory always open a new horizon of knowledge. It can be controversial or may not be true, but always provide a ground to confirm the established truth or to embrace a new one.
On the contrary, similar view toward a problem can facilitate to reach to the solution more quickly. For instance, when the people of a country and it's government believe in the same principle, development accelerates. Similarly, having too much different opinion thwart the progress.
So, to conclude, it is evident that, being with the people of same mentality is not always progressive and that is why to bring out the best outcome, to know the real truth, to learn a situation neutrally we should welcome both side of the coin.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 793, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e of same ideology, can one time limits ones view. Additionally, continuous inter...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'similarly', 'so', 'for example', 'for instance', 'kind of', 'more or less', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.206204379562 0.240241500013 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.155109489051 0.157235817809 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0693430656934 0.0880659088768 79% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0638686131387 0.0497285424764 128% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0529197080292 0.0444667217837 119% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0985401459854 0.12292977631 80% => OK
Participles: 0.0419708029197 0.0406280797675 103% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.6295008244 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.029197080292 0.030933414821 94% => OK
Particles: 0.00729927007299 0.0016655270985 438% => OK
Determiners: 0.124087591241 0.0997080785238 124% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0182481751825 0.0249443105267 73% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.021897810219 0.0148568991511 147% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2745.0 2732.02544248 100% => OK
No of words: 486.0 452.878318584 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64814814815 6.0361032391 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.308641975309 0.366273622748 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.205761316872 0.280924506359 73% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.150205761317 0.200843997647 75% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.109053497942 0.132149295362 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6295008244 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 219.290929204 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487654320988 0.48968727796 100% => OK
Word variations: 56.3251657577 55.4138127331 102% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0909090909 23.380412469 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2999928891 59.4972553346 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.772727273 141.124799967 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 23.380412469 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.545454545455 0.674092028746 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 42.6670407782 51.4728631049 83% => OK
Elegance: 1.27516778523 1.64882698954 77% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311172146002 0.391690518653 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.135381751946 0.123202303941 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.092841538664 0.077325440228 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.521554606165 0.547984918172 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.174458216949 0.149214159877 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125070788894 0.161403998019 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080324784182 0.0892212321368 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.365884681924 0.385218514788 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0861395235526 0.0692045440612 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244393542518 0.275328986314 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878566436033 0.0653680567796 134% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88274336283 225% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 9.0 2.70907079646 332% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.