The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The definition of a society can be stated as the group of people who are led by the leader in the direction that will eventually lead to utopia. Here the person selected as a leader can have varied mentality and can make the decision as per his experiences and the advises. However, the verdicts and statements have to have pros and cons. These verdicts or statements can be questioned by the people. And I believe, only by questioning the statements made by authority, a vast vision is made prevail to think. Hence we can agree with the author's statement that well-being of the society can be enhanced by questioning the authority.
There are several examples for this stated thought. The Indian legislature has several bodies. One of the body is selected to make the decisions for the further development and improvement of the nation. This statement of verdict is judged by several other political bodies. If the statement made seem questionable, then other bodies question the statement made and this further taken for judgement. Further discussions are made on this field, previous success incidents are considered, to ultimately evaluate the final conclusion.
To elaborate on the example made in the previous statement, consider the example of GST system which was recently introduced by prime minister Mr. Narendra Modi in India. Prime minister Modi introduced GST system, introducing the services tax and service charges on goods that are purchased or imported. This system initially made substantial increase in the cost price of all the goods. This was questioned and was repudiated by many people. But when the underlying intention came into light, the system was appriciated. The main intention was to pull out the venality which was habituated in many officers and the black money which was made out of that habit. Since this was questioned, it paved the pay to think in wider perspective and understand the intention of the statement made and was eventually accepted.
Right to speak is a great previlege which is given to the people. It is ones duty to use this previlege in the proper way and ultimately lead to the better formation of society. The people has the right to question the authority, when the decisions are made. Only through questions and discussions, a society can be built stronger and beautiful.
Thus, the people has to question the authority, for the statements made, discussed which leads to the development, enhanced and well-being of the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 511, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...a vast vision is made prevail to think. Hence we can agree with the authors statement...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 539, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...l to think. Hence we can agree with the authors statement that well-being of the societ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ege which is given to the people. It is ones duty to use this previlege in the prope...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, then, thus, well, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2087.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07785888078 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81867992474 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467153284672 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.9 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6354981162 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9583333333 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209272739772 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670963322047 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743084882923 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150530742023 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875653273882 0.0667264976115 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.