Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The author's claim on monitoring the e-mail correspondences of all the employees would reduce the waste of resources and protect the company from lawsuit is quiet debatable. The company, which could be called a business enterprise, that would give fund the employees for their work and for the development and prosperity of the nation would have framed some lawsuits for their employees. These lawsuits may include several checks like monitoring the employees work time, checking their email correspondence, such that the resources are not much wasted ans so on. I believe that these checks are important for any company.
In countries such as India, companies have framed strict lawsuits in association with Indian government. These strict rules are same through the country. One among them is to monitor the employees e-mail correspondence. By this regular check, it can be made known the facts like the employee's working hours, the amount of other resources the employee uses and many other things. The resources to any company are important. By doing this an awareness will be created in employee's mind and will not try to squander the company's resources.
Many companies will have their own history of data. To secure these data, several storage devices that costs millions together would be brought and would be allowed to be used by all the employees for their purpose like their work related data, their emails and many other. If these resources are used at profligacy, then it will incur substantial loss to the company. To avoid this the routine check is necessary. Further more, the resources such as the employee's time is also tantamount importance. The more the number of working hours of an employee, the more is the productivity of the company. To accelerate this and to utilize the complete of the company resources, such regular monitoring is important.
Although, it was said in the previous paragraphs that these strict lawsuits are importance, sometimes, this can be deleterious. For example, a company head or CEO may have several e-mails that have to preserved secretly. He may have conversions with their potential customers, that have to be hidden from any employees. In this case the e-mail check of such a person would be perilous. There may be chances of steeling the private data of the company.
Thus, in a nutshell, the company lawsuits to have a regular checks are important for any company, to monitor the proper usage of all sorts of resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun other seems to be countable; consider using: 'many others'.
Suggestion: many others
...eir work related data, their emails and many other. If these resources are used at proflig...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...proper usage of all sorts of resources.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, then, thus, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2080.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08557457213 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73084229795 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466992665037 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 640.8 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.6382648525 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4347826087 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7826086957 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.21739130435 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249787166932 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893339685486 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829658101856 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158740410594 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606929385498 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.