The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
The writer of the issue states that enhancement of the well-being and status quo of a society occurs when majority of its people challenge authority. As far as am I am concerned, I generally agree that challenging a society's authority leads to promote the well-being of the society.
First of all, by questioning the authority, people can urge them to improve the unfavorable situations which are caused by rules, outlines, and laws defined in the very beginning. If majority of a society question authority and express their disapproval of the current status and also the desire for the better condition, the authority attempts to do anything within its jurisdiction to improve the current situation since it is aware that doing otherwise leads to subverting the current authorities by the people and assigning new ones to get the desired outcome.
Secondly, if people do not question the authorities, they do not realize the necessity of the responding to people's objections and needs. Thus, the authorities go on with the management style it is currently pursued and the requisites of the people of society are not answered. Therefore, the problems people currently have yet remain, which vitiates well-being of the society.
However, the reasons that I stated earlier should not be overgeneralize, that in the enhancement of the society is not culminated only by questioning the authorities. People are a major part of the society and if individuals of the society do not put their effort into improving their own society, even when the authorities try to deal with the problems of the society, the situation stays the same no matter how hard authorities try to solve the problem.
In essence, in order to have an improvement in well-being of the society, authorities should be questioned. This way, they understand the needs of individuals of the society and they are forced to satisfy them. But questioning the authorities is not enough, that in individuals should cooperate and try as well in order to improve well-being of the society along with the authorities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 109, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...lize the necessity of the responding to peoples objections and needs. Thus, the authori...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 340.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13823529412 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01606282231 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467647058824 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 552.6 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.2995693222 60.3974514979 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.583333333 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 23.4991977007 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398450829822 0.243740707755 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164908786104 0.0831039109588 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10521843687 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239689749074 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859922604807 0.0667264976115 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.