The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
To begin with, everyone in the society coalesces and represents the nation as a whole. The people of the society forms an governments which resembles as an authoritative committee and the committee is formed by peoples mandate so they are responsible for their own vote and should be well aware of their rights. The people of the society plays a cardinal role in effective implementations by the elected authorities. So the statement suggests the questioning the authoritative committee would enhance the well being of the society to which in my opinion I agree and to corroborate it by following reasons.
Firstly, the people of the society have their rights to question the authoritative committee and ask for proofs about how efficiently the committee is committed to their aim to serve the society. For instance, if a municipal corporation commissioner who is responsible for the efficient work of the corporation is asked to provide the bills and proofs of the work carried out under the corporation authority then the commissioner is bound to provide required documents and proofs. To make this hassle free the municipal corporation should be transparent and provide each and every details of the work carried out by them to make the citizens satisfied and eliminate any chances of interrogation.
Additionally, the people of the society should be keen to know the responsibilities of the authoritative committee and always question the authority about their duties. There are chances that the authoritative committee might be into corruption and deceiving the society. The cautious nature of the people of the society would uncover this corrupt deed and the people responsible for this deed would be sentenced accordingly. For instance, if a government scheme to treat people with severe diseases like cancer, tuberculosis etc at a very nominal price which is formed to serve only the people living in below poverty line category. But instead the authorities are allowing people who do not belong to the below poverty line class by asking for some extra money. This way the corrupt authorities deceive people. This could be eliminated if people raise voice against this corrupt deed.
Finally, the well being of a society is in peoples own hands, if they are well aware of their duties and follows the rules mandated by the authorities and having a transparent insight on the authoritative committee. If people does not raise their voices against the authorities then the authorities will take everything for granted and form their own rules which could hinder the societies well being. For example the new motor vehicle act proposed by the center to increase the fine for a traffic offence by 10 times, which is not at all acceptable. Though people should strictly follow the rules but such a hefty fine could damage ones pocket and is not at all acceptable. For this there should be incremental fines on every offence. So the individual does not dare to repeat the offence next time.
So to conclude, as discussed the authorities are formed after peoples mandate and the people have full rights to question the authorities which would help in efficient work of the authorities and enhance the well being of the society as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... whole. The people of the society forms an governments which resembles as an autho...
^^
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an government' or simply 'governments'?
Suggestion: an government; governments
... whole. The people of the society forms an governments which resembles as an authoritative com...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 554, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng of the society to which in my opinion I agree and to corroborate it by follow...
^^
Line 1, column 570, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y to which in my opinion I agree and to corroborate it by following reasons. ...
^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w efficiently the committee is committed to their aim to serve the society. For i...
^^
Line 9, column 554, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tuberculosis etc at a very nominal price which is formed to serve only the people...
^^
Line 9, column 727, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... do not belong to the below poverty line class by asking for some extra money. Th...
^^
Line 13, column 634, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ules but such a hefty fine could damage ones pocket and is not at all acceptable. Fo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, finally, first, firstly, if, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2726.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 534.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10486891386 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8859160437 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.425093632959 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 862.2 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5087191926 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.80952381 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61904761905 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267080345644 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947150947186 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795201531426 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188479121587 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810655530366 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.