The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
The issue of whether or not people should question authorities is a contentious one. Each has its own positives and negatives that are debatable. But as a responsible citizen who has the opportunity to elect the leader has a right to question how to establish a good and systematic society. It is important for people to question the authorities about the unsolved issues. There are cases where the authorities might not know that people are facing the issue. Speaking up will ensure that the authorities might work responsibility instead of being negligent.
Firstly, people have the right to vote to choose their leader based on their manifesto. Authorities such as the Member of Legislative assembly and the Member of parliament have to announce their manifesto. They promise people to solve issues. If they promise and fail to follow the manifest, it is a person's duty to question and ask the authority about the same. People choose a leader because they feel that the elected person may establish a good society. So unless a person has a valid point to raise there is no need to fear to question the authority.
Secondly, if people question the authorities for not giving them proper facilities it makes authorities act on the issues immediately, it makes the government to be responsible for people. Authorities might fear being pointed out for their negligence or for not solving the issues of the people. A responsible person may raise an issue but it is important that the government acts upon it immediately. It is necessary that when you are not offered what you are promised as a proper tax payer and a citizen of the country a has a right to question the government.
People might neglect a problem because they might think it is not one’s duty and someone else can report the issue. And if everyone in a community is thinking the same, people themselves are encouraging the authorities not to worry for their sufferings. For example, roads are spoiled due to the heavy rains, the government may not notice immediately but if a community or a person who lives in the community should feel responsible to raise an issue, this might definitely make the authorities act upon it. If people living in the area ignore the situation then definitely it provokes the government or the authorities to ignore the problem.
Many people may fear that questioning authorities may be dangerous to them and their families because authorities are so powerful and can take revenge on the helpless individual and can cause harm to their family. But people don't remember that questioning authorities is not a crime and according to the constitution people have a right to raise their voice when they are neglected. It is accepted by the government that a non-violent protest or questioning of the government is legal in a democracy.
In conclusion, India is a democractic country and people choose their leader because they feel he might fulfill their need. When these needs are neglected a person has a right to question the authority because sometimes the government has many other issues to concentrate on or the present issue is not brought into the government's notice. People have to bring the issues to the notice and if they are still unsolved they have a right to question the authorities for people’s well-being.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
The issue of whether or not people should question authorities is a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...nd fail to follow the manifest, it is a persons duty to question and ask the authority ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So unless” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ed person may establish a good society. So unless a person has a valid point to raise the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: WORRY_FOR[1]
Message: The verb 'worry' does not normally take the preposition 'for'. Did you mean 'worry about'?
Suggestion: worry about
... are encouraging the authorities not to worry for their sufferings. For example, roads ar...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 226, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... cause harm to their family. But people dont remember that questioning authorities i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2775.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 561.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94652406417 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86676880123 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86324673784 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.383244206774 0.4932671777 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 885.6 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0574473051 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.730769231 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5769230769 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326254930727 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102194417433 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063847485524 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198371265377 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643493380061 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.