The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
The well-being of society is largely dependent on the society's people and its authority. In the prompts, it is said the well-being of society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. I strongly agree with the prompt for two different reasons.
Firstly, the authority runs the society's rules and regulations, and they can be good, or they can be evil. An evil authority can make a society worsen if people don’t question them. That’s why dictatorship is hatred by most the people around the world. In most of the country, the authority comes to power by the vote of the people. People give them to vote so that they can make society a better place to live. For this reason, whenever the authority makes a bad decision that causes a harmful effect in society, people should question them about their bad decision. If people question authority every time about their irrational decision, then the authority will think twice before they took any evil decision for their good.
Secondly, an authority who can do anything without any question faced, most often they are reckless about their decision. This ultimate power can often make them mislead to take any better decisions. We all know about Hitler and this man is one of the most hated person of world history. He killed thousands of people and made the world war happened. There was no body who can question them. If people go against authority whenever they make mistakes, then the authority will always be careful about their decision.
But on the other hand, there is also some pros of not questioning the authority. If the authority is candid and trustworthy then in most of the case their decision will enhance society facilities for people. By looking the world history, you can find that many unquestionable authorities did a lot of good things which no one can did before. Because not all people are same, there many kinds of people who thinks differently. Among all decision made by the authority, there will be many decisions which will be benefited for some people and will be also harmful for some people. The main reason for this is people have different mentality. So, questions will arise in every decision the authority make, and this can delay every decision which will do not do any good to the society. However, the ultimate power often makes people evil. An honest authority can enhanced the well being of society as well as an evil can also make a society worse for the people. So, questioning faced by the authority is always a better option because maybe it can delay some good decision but overall, it will be good for the maximum of the people of the society.
The well-being of society is largely depending on the authority as well as the people. For making a good society, every one of the societies should give their best and the authority should make decisions for the people not for their own good. The people of the society should support their authority when they take a decision which will good for the maximum number of people. And people should also question them whenever they made decision which is detrimental for the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'nobody'?
Suggestion: nobody
... made the world war happened. There was no body who can question them. If people go aga...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 330, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'do'
Suggestion: do
...d a lot of good things which no one can did before. Because not all people are same...
^^^
Line 6, column 27, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...e society. The well-being of society is largely depending on the authority as well as the people....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2601.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 542.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79889298893 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82502781895 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42450097002 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.363468634686 0.4932671777 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 829.8 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4769181203 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41974087835 0.243740707755 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144395174534 0.0831039109588 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140543839539 0.0758088955206 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30669262497 0.150359130593 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148264277983 0.0667264976115 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.63 8.38706741573 79% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.