The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Many people argue that the public could contribute to the prosperity of the society by questioning the government. Such a statement is plausible to some extent, but if people protest against their authority excessively, the society may face a serious commotion, which will certainly affect people’s daily lives.
Admittedly, being gifted so much control over its people, the government ought to be regulated within its political territory. Many governments will abuse the power, which is given by the public, to detriment people’s interests and rights. For example, the Soviet Union once put many intellectuals, who hold the opposite views against the authority, into jail or persecuted them until they promised to stop questioning government policies. As leaders of the Soviet Union have infinite power over it people and media, their illegal behaviours were revealed only after the break of the Soviet Union. What they had done would have been impeded if there’s a comprehensive rebellion system.
However, many people are not professional when they are protesting government policies. As we all know, almost all the policies are investigated and formed by experts in different areas. For example, an electricity regulation normally requires opinions from economists, ecologists, etc. It is impossible for many ordinary people to have sufficient knowledge to offer effective advices on professional areas. Thus, their protests towards the authority are sometimes ridiculous and meaningless, let alone have the ability to contribute to the well-being of the society.
In addition, if many people gather together to express their dissatisfactory to the government, it may cause some irrational behaviours which could affect people’s daily lives. For example, many protests will end up as a commotion, which cause many people injured or even dead. This kind of protests certainly have nothing to with the well-being of the society, but lead to the chaos of some places.
In sum, although the government’s power should be limited, people also need to acquire more information and behave legally when questioning the authority. Otherwise, it may not achieve the expected results or even undermine the well-being of the society.
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t 62
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 83
- TPO-17:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 50
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...ty by questioning the government. Such a statement is plausible to some extent, ...
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...ioning the government. Such a statement is plausible to some extent, but if peop...
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'for example', 'in addition', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.240786240786 0.240241500013 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.149877149877 0.157235817809 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0810810810811 0.0880659088768 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0515970515971 0.0497285424764 104% => OK
Pronouns: 0.036855036855 0.0444667217837 83% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0933660933661 0.12292977631 76% => OK
Participles: 0.036855036855 0.0406280797675 91% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.06219887097 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.034398034398 0.030933414821 111% => OK
Particles: 0.002457002457 0.0016655270985 148% => OK
Determiners: 0.0933660933661 0.0997080785238 94% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.027027027027 0.0249443105267 108% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.019656019656 0.0148568991511 132% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2259.0 2732.02544248 83% => OK
No of words: 344.0 452.878318584 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.56686046512 6.0361032391 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.421511627907 0.366273622748 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.34011627907 0.280924506359 121% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.261627906977 0.200843997647 130% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.19476744186 0.132149295362 147% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06219887097 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 219.290929204 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572674418605 0.48968727796 117% => OK
Word variations: 64.0721804487 55.4138127331 116% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 20.2352941176 23.380412469 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6518267128 59.4972553346 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.882352941 141.124799967 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 23.380412469 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.647058823529 0.674092028746 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 54.2469220246 51.4728631049 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.55670103093 1.64882698954 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.477682106318 0.391690518653 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0850259334267 0.123202303941 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0527021356596 0.077325440228 68% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.525184844545 0.547984918172 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.15563605242 0.149214159877 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186392253108 0.161403998019 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106636035702 0.0892212321368 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.368524604526 0.385218514788 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0373820394148 0.0692045440612 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.337161301351 0.275328986314 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234124833293 0.0653680567796 36% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.4325221239 38% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.30420353982 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 9.0 3.66592920354 246% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.