This is a troubling question faced by the socities for a very long time and is still faced. No one in this world is perfect, therefore everyones good side should also be considered rather than focussing on his mistakes. Hence, a person's achievement should be given more importance than his mistakes.
Take an example, a great physicist, his contribution to the field is immense, while considering for an award in his field, importance should be given to his contributions in the field of physics. His personal mistakes should not be considered here, like whether he has a drinking problem, drug addiction etc. The award is considering only his contributions in the field and the person as a physicist and not for the moral principles he upholds. If we are to look for faults, there is no one who have not made a mistake in his life.
The acheivements and faults of the person can have no relation between them. The faults he had comitted may be because of his environment. The drinking problem of a person could be ascribed to the problems he face in his family life, the irascible nature of a person may be the result of a strict childhood he had, a person frequently talking to people in a condescending manner maybe because of his insecurities. For all these faults he has, he alone may not be responsible, but the achievements are result of his hardwork and should not be ignored for the faults he was not alone responsible.
There are some situations when persons faults are to be considered when giving importance to his achievements. For example when a scientist comes forward with a new breakthrough in his field, the theory put forward by him should be throughly analyzed. As whether he deliberately distorted the results for a particular results, or whether he stole the idea from someone. If he had commited any such mistakes, his other achievements should also be under scrutiny. This could be generalised in any field. If the achievements and the faults have direct relation then importance should not be given those achievements as it could be the result of some misdoing from the person.
Therefore the importance should be given to achievements of the person than his personal faults.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...han focussing on his mistakes. Hence, a persons achievement should be given more import...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tted may be because of his environment. The drinking problem of a person could be a...
^^^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'faces'.
Suggestion: faces
...on could be ascribed to the problems he face in his family life, the irascible natur...
^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a condescending manner" with adverb for "condescending"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
..., a person frequently talking to people in a condescending manner maybe because of his insecurities. For ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...lt of some misdoing from the person. Therefore the importance should be given to achie...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, may, so, still, then, therefore, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85978835979 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93837230487 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457671957672 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.9 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4369892855 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.055555556 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38888888889 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199698537916 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918152655866 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713851663765 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158581984327 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664762001685 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.