Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Every coin has two sides. Similarly, every proposal also has different aspects that have to evaluate before coming on to the conclusion of agreement or disagreement. Even though this proposal seems to be convincing sometimes, evaluating both sides will help to stand stronger.
In many fields, people always criticize the opinions of the person who is a neophyte. People never believe someone who has just entered or totally outside of the field. For instance, in a commercial world, interns' opinions have always been given very little importance than someone who has a broad experience in that field. This might be because the neophytes lack the skill and hence not good at their work. One may argue that if the person is well capable, then his judgment will be considered. But for critical judgment, an amateur's opinion is hardly considered unless he/she provides proper evidence about it. Hence the author's proposal about the importance given to a judgment of any person is believable.
Conversely, it is also possible that newcomers might give more useful advice to a problem than that from the experts. This is because their thinking and thought process is much raw hence making them think out of the box. On the other hand, the experts’ mindset is to think only in a particular direction with respect to his concerned field and hence won’t be able to give innovative solutions to the problem. Thus, if this is the case then the critical judgment of work in any given field has more value even though it comes from a newcomer.
For example, if we consider any job interview, the person who has more experience is always offered a higher position than the other. This is only because, for critical judgment, the experience of the person will help to take a cautious decision. As very well said, the experience is the best teacher. Experience teaches a person to learn from his mistakes and become an expert in it. Experience guides a person to choose a path. Hence, believing in an expert for critical judgment always puts people on a safer side.
To sum up, it is the expert whose judgment will have more value in critical judgment of work as he has more experience and knowledge in that field. Despite that, sometimes this might not be true and more dependent on the situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 527, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'amateurs'' or 'amateur's'?
Suggestion: amateurs'; amateur's
...nsidered. But for critical judgment, an amateurs opinion is hardly considered unless he/...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 614, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
.../she provides proper evidence about it. Hence the authors proposal about the importan...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 624, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...des proper evidence about it. Hence the authors proposal about the importance given to ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, hence, if, may, similarly, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85204081633 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55560811967 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494897959184 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.116078804 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4545454545 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0640707318972 0.243740707755 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0201808430658 0.0831039109588 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0197902795475 0.0758088955206 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0380663156883 0.150359130593 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00748245818088 0.0667264976115 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.