The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyse the trends of its youth.
The statement that the most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyse the trends of its youth is very strong and might not always be true. There are many other ways by which one could understand contemporary culture. We will discuss the same in the further passage.
The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyse the trends of its youth because they like to keep themselves updated. For instance, in today’s world of music, pop culture is an emerging genre and it is also trending among youngsters because of their keen interest in knowing new things. On the other hand, the elders don’t like to change themselves and adapt to new stuff. They mostly prefer old music over the new ones. Thus understanding the contemporary culture based on the elders’ trends will give false contention. Hence analysing the trends of the youth will surely give the correct understanding of contemporary culture.
In contrast, it is not always correct to say that analysing trends of youths will help to understand the contemporary form of traditional culture. The cultural rituals and traditions are mostly followed by the elders and are taught to the youngsters. Thus, the elders contribute more towards the culture and teach the youth to do so. Every cultural ritual being conducted has its meaning which the elders understand more and if only they are successful in passing this knowledge correctly to the youths, these rituals will not die in the future. For instance, in India, Ganesh Chaturthi is one of the famous festivals celebrated with joy all over the nation. In this, people worship the idol of Lord Ganesh. Some youths misunderstand the tradition and make noise pollution by playing loud music on roads. Thus as the society, whether it be modern or old, constitutes of both the elders and youths - the analysis of only the youths’ trends will definitely not give a correct understanding of the culture in this contemporary world.
Sometimes, the new contemporary culture is just a renewed form of the old culture. In order to understand this culture, it is important to analyse both the views of new as well as old. For instance, Kathak, one of the traditional dance forms in India, has reborn into various new contemporary dance forms. If one wants to study these new dance forms, he also needs to gain a sound knowledge of its origin. Likewise, along with the trends of youths, it is important to consider the views of old people while understanding contemporary culture.
In conclusion, yes it is an effective way to understand the contemporary culture by analysing the trends of its youth, but not the most effective ones. This modern society is made up of both elders and youths. Thus, a proper analysis will be to analyse the trends of both groups.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 545, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ers’ trends will give false contention. Hence analysing the trends of the youth will ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 805, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...llution by playing loud music on roads. Thus as the society, whether it be modern or...
^^^^
Line 3, column 855, Rule ID: CONSTITUTES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'consists of'?
Suggestion: consists of
...e society, whether it be modern or old, constitutes of both the elders and youths - the analys...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ortant to analyse both the views of new as well as old. For instance, Kathak, one of the t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, likewise, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2339.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95550847458 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77151779205 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432203389831 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.0 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6689789903 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.56 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.88 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.557712393909 0.243740707755 229% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177910589247 0.0831039109588 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.210317731019 0.0758088955206 277% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.40412477609 0.150359130593 269% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147357799252 0.0667264976115 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.