Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
The claim that "Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance" seems to be incorrect because of many reasons. It is the students' intelligence and hardwork which leads to good academic performance as the teachers just act as a catalyst in the learning process. In some situations, it is correct to agree with the claim considering the students’ profits.
The students' hardwork, persistence and determination are what pays them off with good academic performance. For instance, the students studying in colleges have much fewer grades as compared to their academic performance during high school. As the students when they come to colleges lose their sincerity, thus lowering their academic performance. It proves that the students are responsible for their academic performance and not the teachers, hence it won't be a good choice to base the teachers' salaries according to their students' academic performance.
Teachers may try their level best but the student might have some problem from his end. For example, if a student takes admission into a course like Engineering but lacks basic knowledge of mathematics. In this case, the student will definitely suffer and will get poor grades, even though the teacher teaches with full dedication if he doesn't strengthen his math basics. Thus, there might be a problem from students' side for which punishing the teachers by offering them lesser pay is not a good option.
In contrast, sometimes it is beneficial to base the teachers' salaries on their students' academic performance. As everyone has greed for money and hence the teachers are also not an exception. Thus, they will try their best to improve the academic performance of the students in order to get higher payments. This will not only improve the reputation of the institute but also prove to be beneficial for the students. Resultingly basing the teachers' salaries according to their students' academic performance is justifiable.
Thus, the claim in some aspects is agreeable, but not always. As said before there might be a problem from students' end or might be the case that the student is not persistent or lacking determination in studies. Thus, won't be a good choice to punish the teachers by giving them lesser pay because of the students' mistake.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...rect because of many reasons. It is the students intelligence and hardwork which leads t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...cher teaches with full dedication if he doesnt strengthen his math basics. Thus, there...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...m in some aspects is agreeable, but not always. As said before there might be a proble...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 372.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20161290323 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91406156887 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456989247312 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 586.8 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7526616034 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.842105263 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5789473684 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26315789474 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0997725372418 0.243740707755 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425536399769 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331403376778 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076475309736 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358482462733 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.