Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for t

Essay topics:

Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Life without a goal is absolutely meaningless. To achieve something better, also to fully understand the meaning of our lives, we should be goal-specific having firm determination, with long term goal from the early young age, otherwise, life can be derailed from the beginning of the young age. But in many cases, there is need of immediate fame and recognition to achieve our ultimate goal. So, I argue with the author's claim that young people with respect to their goals and objective, they can also seek immediate fame and recognition, but being a goal-less is like a journey without any aim.

Today's young generation are the future builder of the nation. It is very important to help their pursue their young age towards the subject of their interest, and drive them towards their long term goals. They should be cultured very well, because their environment, culture and tradition play vital role in shaping their goals in the future. For example; a child of a terrorist might see terrorism as a propriety and willing to become a terrorist as like his parent. But is this goal is appropriate and good to be realistic? So, it is necessary to carefully examine what exactly our young generation need? Are they in good culture, good environment or else? It is our duty of the parents and adults to help their in the selection of their needs and desires which should be realistic.

Sometimes, they might dream to be something which seem ridiculous to us, might be unrealistic to achieve in the future according to our thought. But in our world there are various examples in which people had achieved their so-called unrealistic dreams too in their lives. For example; if the parents of Wright Brothers had not encouraged them in their at the time "unrealistic project", can we dream of the evolution of automobile and cycles without their tremendous contribution. So, dreams might seem unrealistic today, but the intense desire to pursue can make happen it real in the future, in the near future. So, every parents and adults carefully examine their child dreams and help them to pursue them if those dreams are really meaningful and logical. Many "unrealistic" dreams of many scientists had given numerous inventions and discoveries in this world due to which we are having a easy and better life than our forefathers.

Immediate fame and recognition are also very important in some dreams. They need such requirement, so to get fulfilled in the long term too. Also, in the world, there are many such talents, which get recognized and famed in their earlier age, which many people eager to get till their old age, but cannot successfully achieve that dreams. So, immediate fame and recognition is common in some aspects which helps to give respect, honour and inspiration to those talents to burgeon and flourish among the young generation too. For example; in football, in the early teenage Lionel Messi, become famed and recognized the most popular footballer of the era when he entered in the international football career. Such immediate fame and recognition has risen his potential and inspiration to all the football lovers and players in the world.

Proponents of the above claim might argue that immediate fame and recognition can dissolve people in a fraction of their career because prompt success is equally harmful as seem apparently worthy. But, to get immediate success and fame does not always lack the enough skills and talents. Every coins has it's two parts, pros and cons. It might be harmful for those, who are just exalted without having serious talents and skills in their respective fields. We should focus on the long term-goals and help the young to select their choice of interest and also give priority to the immediate fame and recognition, if they are really deserving.

Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 915, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n this world due to which we are having a easy and better life than our forefathe...
Line 9, column 289, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...ays lack the enough skills and talents. Every coins has its two parts, pros and cons....
Line 9, column 301, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
... enough skills and talents. Every coins has its two parts, pros and cons. It might ...
Line 9, column 620, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...immediate fame and recognition, if they are really deserving.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, really, so, well, for example, in many cases, with respect to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 39.0 14.8657303371 262% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3193.0 2235.4752809 143% => OK
No of words: 639.0 442.535393258 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99687010955 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.02776782673 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77382910509 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 215.323595506 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43661971831 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 984.6 704.065955056 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1619663873 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.103448276 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0344827586 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.03448275862 5.21951772744 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 10.2758426966 224% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224924129284 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065353579101 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474063273164 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141915255559 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473019087253 0.0667264976115 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.