Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take

Essay topics:

Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.

Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

One of the most important and complex phases of life that, in addition to enhance knowledge, shapes a human being, contributes for an all-round development and growth, associates him with the highly functioning world, is college. College education goes beyond books, moulding the person, both physically and mentally, shaping and focusing on his career. With more and more students embracing higher education, the state stands to benefit economically, prosper culturally and in terms of new leaders from today’s youth force. Nevertheless, do every student who enrols in higher education come from economically firm backgrounds? Given the rising cost of education and vast majority of the population belonging from middle class families, how is it possible that this basic question of relaxing the tuition fees has escaped the minds of policy makers? Thus, every Government should strive to make university education free for students who have been enrolled, but cannot pay the tuition fees.

To be educated is our right, and to educate is our duty. It is this fundamental law which now has been monetized and been turned into a money laundering scheme- an opportunity for tax collectors and investors to extort money from students and professionals alike. With this gradual trend, we oversee how important education today is to a country and to its people. It is the educated force, who creates all the difference, and not merely money- as without education and proper knowledge, development will lose its trail and money will become futile. Hence, a Government, as its fundamental duty towards its citizen, should encourage university education, without burdening the students, especially the needy ones, with the liability of tuition fees.

Exempting the students from tuition costs of university education will have advantages manifold. There will be an inevitable increase in the number of students opting for higher education- especially those with merits but not with enough funding. This will provide the State a continuous stream of well professional engineers, doctors, theorists, artists, thinkers, writers and revolutionists, among the many. With sound education, these people can positively contribute towards the society – in fields of advancement of technology, health research, increase in aesthetic values, literary works, towards deeper understanding of the past and future, and bringing in changes. Students, thus can be encouraged to pursue higher education for positively contributing towards research and development, or academics. Hence, a nation stands to benefit, in all aspects, raising the potential of people and itself in general, thus welcoming a “smarter economy”.

On the contrary, education comes at a great price. University education costs soar due to inclusion of newer labs, advanced technology, securing patents, getting new projects and research subjects. Without charging the students the tuition fees, the cost to state will rise to an unexpected value. Private universities, unlike having a support from Governments for most public universities, will not be able to remunerate the faculties. Quality of education will droop, and the overall benefits will observe a gradual plunge. Policy makers, before passing the bills of free university education, should therefore, examine the situation with greater care and deeper contemplation.

With an increase in number of students applying for redemption from tuition fees, a proper background examination deems to be obligatory for the universities. Consideration should be done strictly on the basis of merit and low family income groups. Tie – ups with university students to serve and contribute, maybe in terms of academics, research or money, to their alma mater after they have flourished and established themselves, will no doubt help to regain the cost to university per students. Meanwhile, grants and funds for research can be channelized from students placed in big industries and research groups.

Implementing the bills for free higher education for the low income background students, undoubtedly, will foster merit and greater encouragement towards pursuing masters, PhDs, or even post-doctoral researches, must however be done after careful scrutiny, as it involves an enormous amount of money, investment of energy, years of research, and an ultimate aim for the versatile development of the nation in the long run, which if achieved, will escalate the nation’s respect among peers. After-all, education is the sole instrument for evolution and progress.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 932, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e and itself in general, thus welcoming a 'smarter economy'. On th...
^
Line 23, column 430, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...nt of the nation in the long run, which if achieved, will escalate the nation&apos...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, in general, no doubt, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 36.0 14.8657303371 242% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 90.0 58.6224719101 154% => OK
Nominalization: 45.0 12.9106741573 349% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3915.0 2235.4752809 175% => OK
No of words: 695.0 442.535393258 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63309352518 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.13447686263 4.55969084622 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00279393043 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 369.0 215.323595506 171% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530935251799 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 1203.3 704.065955056 171% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.905969113 60.3974514979 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9655172414 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41379310345 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 10.2758426966 234% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200983127792 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612192349391 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590055401951 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1174571131 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346816945907 0.0667264976115 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.1392134831 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.1639044944 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 209.0 100.480337079 208% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.