31.The percentage and exact time (weekly ) males and females spent on house tasks in 2010 of a country
The bar graphs provide the proportion and time spent on different house stuffs by males and females in 2010 of a nation.
In overall, the figure for females in doing house activities surpassed that of males in both the time and proportion graphs, excepting for appliances repair.
Referring to the percentage graph, 80% of women took part in preparing meals in 2010, which was approximately 40% higher than males’ figure. Moreover, in terms of cleaning and taking care of pets, females also surpassed males by 30% and nearly 2% each. In contrast, housing repair was the only section that the proportion of men experienced a higher number than that of females in 2010.
According to the time chart,while women spent more than 80 minutes cooking food, 20 minutes were the average time men allocated on this section. The case was also the same when it came to cleaning, at 40 minutes in females and 10% in males respectively. Likewise, while caring pets saw the similar amount of time in both 2 genders at around 18 minutes, house repair was the only sector which men exceeded females.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 28, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
...es in 2010. According to the time chart,while women spent more than 80 minutes cookin...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, moreover, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86021505376 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55875573155 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586021505376 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.4373940675 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284789814961 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131941988931 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755658912282 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199220230196 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711877428804 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.