Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects But others belive that teenagers should focus on the subject that they are best at or that they find the most interesting Disscuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects. But, others belive that teenagers should focus on the subject that they are best at or that they find the most interesting. Disscuss both views and give your opinion.

School-related issues have always been considered to create such a controversial debate among people. In addition, a lot of aldults force their kids to absorb knowledge from all subjects at schools. However, the others believe that a permission to study favorite courses is really necessary, leading to a sense of comfort in teenagers. Although there are many reasons behind the preference of studying certain lessons, I believe it will be more beneficial if youngsters allocate more time to possess a wide range of subjects.
On the other hand, I understand why many people of the fervent conviction argue that absorbing only favorite courses has many potential merits. To begin with, by covering all the aspects of a certain field in study, students can gain more proficiency, helping them to gain expertise in their domains. For example, a student who allocates most of his or her time to study Math is likely to be more excellent in this area than a child spending time struggling with various subjects. Moreover, by reducing the number of subjects, children have more opportunities to gratify personal leisure time. Additionally, it is widely believe that many kids suffer from depression as they take part in lots of classes on a daily basis. Hence, if there are only a few subjects to manage left , kids can receive a greater sense of comforts, leading to a lower rate of mental illness.
Despite these reasons describe above, my firm conviction is that there are many reasons why concentrating to all subjects is extremely advantageous to children’s later life. Firstly, the more areas the students cope well with, the more options in jobs they may receive in the future. For instance, while a person concentrating on art can only apply to art-related fields, a student who is well-rounded will survives even if they are put in a different career, leading to lower risks of unemployment in the future.Moreover, it would be easier for youngsters to exactly find out their specialization. Additonally, a lot of kids realize their judicious aptitudes after learning all kinds of subjects. Hence, coping well with all courses may acts as a rudimental contribution to the regconisation of favorite aspects.
Taking everything into consideration, although I understand why many people still prefer to encourage their kids to develop their strong fields, focusing on all subjects is more beneficial to each individual’s life.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
...eisure time. Additionally, it is widely believe that many kids suffer from depression a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 776, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e are only a few subjects to manage left , kids can receive a greater sense of com...
^^
Line 4, column 407, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'survive'
Suggestion: survive
...lds, a student who is well-rounded will survives even if they are put in a different car...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 513, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...wer risks of unemployment in the future.Moreover, it would be easier for youngsters to e...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2042.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16962025316 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03230573552 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554430379747 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5257966471 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.625 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6875 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132539273236 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436992033535 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281701884326 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876136126177 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00955094474757 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.