Employer should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job. To what extend do you agree or disagree
In this contemporary society, the job’s market has become a more competitive field compared to the past. Additionally, since the number of candidates applying for jobs increases on a significant scale, there are more different viewpoints about the requirements of hiring professional employees. Some people argue that employers should concentrate on personal information more than experience or diplomas. Personally, I partly approve with this statement as I see both components as equal importance.
To begin with, people cannot deny the essential role personal qualities have played in the recruitment of several organisations. Additionally, such an approach of checking personal profiles via social network or resumes helps each manager to deeply understand about their employee’s personalities or status. For instance, KFC has recently required new staff to provide thorough CV before starting the job. Hence, if the information about each workers is fully collected, the managers can avoid high rate of evil individuals who desire to do harm to the whole organisations.
On the other hand, I believe not only qualifications but also experience are also essential criterias to assess employees on different areas. Firstly, the more experienced the workers are, the more effective performances they will provide. In addition, while seniors who get accustomed to the work’s conditions know how to keep the progress without facing barriers, the inexperienced ones tend to struggle more in dealing with heavy workloads. Hence, the companies surrounded by experienced employees have more opportunities to enhance their quality and strategy. Secondly, it is widely believed that qualifications is the most unprejudiced method to assess each individual’s ability. For instance, by observing the art-related diplomas, press companies find it more straightforward to employ artists who possess sufficient quality or suit the company the most.
Taking everything into consideration, although I cannot deny the importance of personal qualities in terms of employing workers, the emergence of qualifcations or experience cannot be refuted in this recruiting process.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for instance, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82131661442 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28675275671 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652037617555 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9657851817 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.8 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166065550353 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519554011374 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402651211892 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099435210676 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146577795484 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.