Some people think that companies and private individuals should pay to clear up the pollution they produced, the government should not pay for it. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Environmental problems have always been a controversial topic that everyone in the world concern about. It is commonly argued that private organisations and public should invest more money to minimize the amount of pollution they produce, and government do not have to take responsibility on this issue. While I fully accept that certain companies and each individual should be penalished for this problem, I still believe government plays a significant role in decreasing the alarming situation of pollution.
On the other hand, governments should support their countries to improve a pressing situation related to pollution. In addtiotion,not every individuals can pay for such a large amount of money to clear up the pollution.For example, impoverished people not only have to deal with family expenses but also have to find money to gratify their private necessities.Hence, the government can sponsor funding to ease that heavy burden from the poor.
On the other hand, there are many reasons why I believe companies and people should also pay for contaminating the land. Firstly, several companies nowadays enjoy natural resources such as forests, water, lands to boost their profits. Hence, if these organisations are not obligied to share the amount of money to rescue the nature, they will become more greedy in terms of earning profits without care about the devastating impacts on environment. Secondly, penalishing people for polluting can enhance their awareness when it comes to protecting the environment. For instance, residents in Singapore will be fined by government if they unconsciously throw their rubbish on the road or water. Since the public aware more about the money they have to spend when polluting the land , environmatental problems can be measured in a great scale.
Taking everything into consideration, while I personally think that government also plays a significant role in supporting the public to tackle pollution and many environmental issues, companies and individuals take the main responsibility in dealing with polluting problems they create.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 129, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , not
...tion related to pollution. In addtiotion,not every individuals can pay for such a la...
^^^^
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ount of money to clear up the pollution.For example, impoverished people not only h...
^^^
Line 2, column 360, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...ey to gratify their private necessities.Hence, the government can sponsor funding to ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 781, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ey have to spend when polluting the land , environmatental problems can be measure...
^^
Line 4, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sonally think that government also plays a significant role in supporting the pub...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, as for, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49068322981 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13766054354 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55900621118 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.1047740232 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.333333333 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279143900066 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994379801062 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664191792867 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170042120053 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233348462345 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.