Some people think that companies and private individuals should pay to clear up the pollution they produced, the government should not pay for it. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Environmental problems have always been a controversial topic that everyone in the world concern about. It is commonly argued that private organisations and public should invest more money to minimize the amount of pollution they produce, and government do not have to take responsibility on this issue. While I fully accept that certain companies and each individual should be penalished for this problem, I still believe government plays a significant role in decreasing the alarming situation of pollution.
On the other hand, governments should support their countries to improve a pressing polution. In addtiotion,not every individuals can pay for such a large amount of money to clear up the pollution.For example, impoverished people not only have to deal with family expenses but also have to find money to gratify their private necessities.Hence, the government can sponsor funding to ease that heavy burden from the poor.
On the other hand, there are many reasons why I believe companies and people need to be penalished for contaminating the land. Firstly, several companies nowadays enjoy natural resources such as forests, water, lands to boost their profits. Hence, if these organisations are not obligied to share the amount of money, they will become more greedy in terms of earning profits without care about the devastating impacts on environment. Secondly, penalishing people for polluting can also enhance their awareness in protecting the environment. For instance, residents in Singapore will be fined by government if they unconsciously throw their rubbish on the road. As a result,environmatental problems can be measured in a great scale.
Taking everything into consideration, while I personally think that government also plays a significant role in supporting the public to tackle pollution, companies and individuals need to take the main responsibility to the polluting problems they create.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , not
...prove a pressing polution. In addtiotion,not every individuals can pay for such a la...
^^^^
Line 2, column 197, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ount of money to clear up the pollution.For example, impoverished people not only h...
^^^
Line 2, column 338, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...ey to gratify their private necessities.Hence, the government can sponsor funding to ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 673, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , environmatental
...w their rubbish on the road. As a result,environmatental problems can be measured in a great sca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sonally think that government also plays a significant role in supporting the pub...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, as for, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53559322034 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30983578555 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.7817257561 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.083333333 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260928484347 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846381939626 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584817312732 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155213763127 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384673205881 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.