Scientists have been warning for many years about protecting the environment and we must limit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warnings, many people do not do this. What are the reasons for that and how people can be encouraged to take interest in protecting the environment
In this contemporary society, environmental threat has become an urgent problem. Therefore, many environmentalists have been warning people to protect the environemt and limiting the use of energy on a daily basis. Despite the encouragement, people still ignore the pressing rate of this problem, continuing the use coal or fuels. There are many factors behind the unawareness of humans, and I believe measurements can be adopted to eradicate this alarming issue.
On the other hand, the reason why people pay less attention to the reduction in energy use comes from different aspects. To begin with, the life of humans has based on coal or fuels for many centuries. For instance, while people drive private vehicles which are run by diesels on a daily basis, factories also adapt fossil fuels to their manufacture. Hence, it is widely believed that the alteration of the system is not only complicated but also exorbitant. Moreover, compared to other environmentally-friendly alternatives , industrial chemicals are more efficient.Taking transportation as an example, private cars are faster than bicycles as they reduce a large amount of commuting time Consequently, it is extremely difficult to prohibit commuters from using products related to gas or fossil fume.
Despite the serious reasons described above, I still consider that timely solutions can be provided to encourage people to take an awareness in protecting the environment. Firstly, companies should replace the use of coal and fuels by more economical alternatives. For instance, it is Toyota company that customers have the opportunities to experience cars which are run by economical diesel. If this trend continues to spread overseas, the rate of gas can be strictly reduced, avoiding air pollution on a great scale. Moreover, education also plays an important role . Additionally, many people in this contemporary society are well-educated about the harmful effects of fossil fules. As a result, this method may not only help people realize the tremendous impacts of industrial chemicals on their life but also encourage them to use more environmentally-friendly vehicles such as bikes.
Taking everything into consideration, there are many potential reasons which directly lead to the unconsciousness of humans in protecting environment. Moreover , since the common environment is fully affected by the overuse of energy, measurements should be adopted as soon as possible to alter humans’ mindset and eradicate urgent problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...er environmentally-friendly alternatives , industrial chemicals are more efficient...
^^
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Taking
...industrial chemicals are more efficient.Taking transportation as an example, private c...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 567, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
..., education also plays an important role . Additionally, many people in this conte...
^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...mans in protecting environment. Moreover , since the common environment is fully a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, for instance, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2125.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54830287206 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39167458177 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57180156658 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 699.3 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2633048898 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.055555556 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2777777778 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311534707458 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922509813255 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837153032144 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184968004761 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806704087873 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.