The bar graphs below provides information on the number of men and women students studying computer science at UK university. The students are divided into two categories which are national and international for three periods of time from 2010 to 2012.
Overall, It shows that female students residing in the UK were found studying this subject higher compared to international female students. Only certain percentage of male students who came from other countries to study in the UK university seem to be interested to study computer science rather than the local male students.
In 2010 male students residing in the UK who were engaged in this course were almost 40% which is higher than the international male students which is 20%. However, In 2011 the number of students who came from different nations to study computer science grew subsequently to almost 3% whereas the student residing in UK declined comparatively than the beginning. Furthermore, In 2012 international students involved in computer science course reached to almost 40% and the student who resided in UK involved in this course were 43%.
We can see that from 2010 local female students involved in computer science course grew gradually from almost 33% to 45% until 2012 which was the highest data recorded. Moreover, International female students who were engaged in this course were very low which was 13% in 2010 but it raised gradually to 20% in the end.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...were found studying this subject higher as compared to the international female st...
^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... course were almost 40% which is higher as compared to the international students ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14225941423 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74235147055 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456066945607 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 367.2 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.8372480136 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 136.555555556 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5555555556 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328004381045 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169861805489 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112665420266 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235156498565 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101223224739 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.