The bar chart below shows figures of annual coffee and meat consumption.

The bar chart compares the amount of coffee and meat consumed in Norway, France, Germany, USA, Russia, China and Japan every year.

Overall, USA has the highest rate of meat consumption, while, Japan has the least. It can clearly be seen that Norway has a high amount of coffee consumption, whilst, China has the lowest consumption rate.

The graph shows that USA has a highest meat consumption of 122kgs, while, Japan has the least, at 42kgs. There are three countries with high meat consumption rate, which are Germany, France and Norway at 87kgs, 72kgs and 60kgs respectively. Morever, Russia and China has a lower consumption rate of 45kgs and 47kgs respectively.

Coffee consumption was relatively low in all seven countries throughout the year. Norway has the greatest coffee consumption of 9kgs, whilst, China has the lowest of 2kgs. France and Russia has an equal coffee consumption rate of 5kgs. Only Germany has a slightly higher consumption amount of 7kgs for the year, On the other hand, USA and Japan has a relative low consumption of 4kgs and 3kgs respectively.

To sum up, meat consumption was relatively higher in all given countries, as coffee consumption was lower throughout the year.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...n rate. The graph shows that USA has a highest meat consumption of 122kgs, whi...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11055276382 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.728795909 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477386934673 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8860093308 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4545454545 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163516878227 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765994386022 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555078426476 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114880070429 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054162514772 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.