The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.
The chart compares the proportions of Australian men and women doing regular physical activity in 2010. There were six of age groups which were divide by the age range.
First of all, it was cleared that the percentage of male doing physical activity in the age range of 15 to 24 reached its percentage, at 52.8% which was higher than female's percentage by 5%. On the one hand, there was a significant drop rate of men in the age range of 25 to 34 by 10%. On the other hand, with the same age group, the percentage of women rose slightly around 2%.
Secondly, there was a tendency rising of women's percentage in the age range between 25 to 64. It was important to note that, the percentage of women's doing physical activity rising dramatically from 48.9% in age group of 25 to 34 to 53% in the age group of 55 to 64. Nonetheless, the men's rate kept its steadily around 44%. In the age group of 65 and over, the percentage of women and men kept the same percentage.
In general, the bar chart depicted the percentage of men and women doing regular physical activity in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'divided'.
Suggestion: divided
...There were six of age groups which were divide by the age range. First of all, it was...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l, it was cleared that the percentage of male doing physical activity in the age ...
^^
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'reached' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'reaches'.
Suggestion: reaches
...l activity in the age range of 15 to 24 reached its percentage, at 52.8% which was high...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, in general, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41206030151 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50323898157 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447236180905 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7671436331 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434327146108 0.215688989381 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204255450543 0.103423049105 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134690191775 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.332843414669 0.15604864568 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101346203879 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.48 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.