The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.
The bar graph provides data on the proportion of men and women from Australia in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.
In general, it can be seen that the percentage of Australian women who did physical activity was higher than men in all age groups, except for 15 to 24. Additionally, it is clear that the figure for female was higher in middle-age groups.
Looking at the graph for young-age groups in more detail, it is evident that the percentage of Australian women who did regular pyhsical activity in 2010 was higher in 25 to 34 and 35 to 44 age groups, compared to men, by 48.9% against 42.2% and 52.5% against 39.5 respectively. Although those figures, the proportion of Australian men who did regular physical activity in 2010, at 52.8%, was higher than women, at 47.7%.
45 to 54 age group had the biggest percentage difference between Australian men and women who did regular physical activity in 2010. In this group, figure for women was the highest of the all graph, at 53.3%, followed by women in 55 to 64 age group, by 53%. Data on 65 and over aged men and women who did regular physical activity in the same year showed very close to each other, former was 46.7% and latter was 47.1%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, except for, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60909090909 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48434769529 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481818181818 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.1937496258 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.75 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.56959404878 0.215688989381 264% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.313342397151 0.103423049105 303% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168870668057 0.0843802449381 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.413138047362 0.15604864568 265% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114401422016 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.