The graph depicts the physical activities that are done by Australian males and females in the year 2010 where the x-axis represents the different age groups and the y axis represents the percentage of both genders.
The only group where males surpass females is between 15-24 years that is 52.4%.In other groups especially in the age group 35-44, there is the maximum difference in percentages that is about 13% followed by a 10 % difference in the age group 45-54 which is around 10.3%. The group that comes after this in the list is the age group of 25-34, here the male percentage of being regular in physical activities is 42.2 % and females stand with 48.9% in regularity. The only age group where both the groups come neck to the neck is people who belong to 65 and above.
Thus, it can be observed that in almost all the categories females exceed at least 50% in being regular in their physical fitness and the youth age is the only group where males are exceeding the 50% mark. This gives a basic overview that women in all the age groups are more concerned and have more will to be regular in their routines and can balance their work-life as well as fitness both.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the physical activities that are done by Australian males and females in the year...
^^
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...es is between 15-24 years that is 52.4%.In other groups especially in the age grou...
^^
Line 2, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s is 42.2 % and females stand with 48.9% in regularity. The only age group where ...
^^
Line 2, column 549, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...neck to the neck is people who belong to 65 and above. Thus, it can be observed ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, thus, well, at least, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56872037915 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3187735918 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502369668246 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.4017195474 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.666666667 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.1666666667 22.9334400587 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306140807833 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16221311376 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565320167592 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211441067756 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628875373759 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.82 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.