Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's recent success with call- in advice programming, and citing a nationwide survey indicating that many radio listeners are quite interested in such programs, the station manager of KICK in Medway recommends that KICK include more call-in advice programs in an attempt to gain a larger audience share in its listening area.
The preceding argument mentions that two years ago radio station WQCP had started a radio-advice program and it was a great success among people and in general also a survey is there in which it is mentioned that nationwide also these programs are going viral and by seeing this great results the manager of KICK also concluded that they should also start call-in-advice programs to attract their audiences. Though this argument may have some value author has articulated it with various questionable premises and lack of pieces of evidence and readers cannot solely rely on the evidence that has been provided by the author.
The primary issue with the author's argument is its unsubstantiated premises. It is claimed that radio call services are getting popularity and hence KICK in Medway should also go for it. However it may be because of the population difference or the popularity of radios are more in Rockville as compared to other cities and thus the people of Rockville are more indulged and attracted to call-in-advice programs or it could be the reason that WQCP is recently coming to the market and to gain the attention of their listeners they had used this program to increase their popularity which may not be in the case of KICK, maybe they are already that much popular that they didn't need these programs, instead they can go for new and more innovative podcasts.
I addition, the further problem with the argument is the lack of evidence that has been provided author, first of all, the statistics of the survey is not mentioned anywhere what if the people who are into this kind of programs are retired people and most of them had moved to Rockville only, or what if the population of Rockville is very much low as compared with the Medway like in Rockville it could be 200 and 2000 in Medway. Thus there will be a great difference in the results of a survey.
Although there are several issues with the argument we cannot declare the whole argument without a base, it could be of more value and underscored if the author has provided a proper amount of statistical data like what is the age groups of the people who listen to call-in advice, what is the population of respective cities or what is the occupation of these people, if these things were provided then maybe the argument could be of greater value. Though there are several issues with the argument it could be improved significantly.
In conclusion, the author's illogical arguments are based on unsubstantiated premises and questionable evidence but it could be more clear and persuasive if the points which are mentioned in the last paragraph were included, as of now his poorly reasoned argument will likely convince few people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-08 | Jonginn | 63 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | s.sim | 58 | view |
| 2023-05-09 | manisha_karim | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | Mufaddal Rangwala | 50 | view |
| 2022-09-03 | illidian | 79 | view |
- Two years ago radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call in advice programs that it broadcast since that time its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly Given WCQP s recent succe 55
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 87
- To reverse a decline in listener numbers our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock music format The decline has occurred despite population growth in our listening area but that growth has resulted mainly from people moving here 55
- Claim The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models Reason Heroes and role models reveal a society s highest ideals 50
- Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve 50
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 8 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 467 350
No. of Characters: 2226 1500
No. of Different Words: 201 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.649 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.767 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.631 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 157 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 114 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 85 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 43 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 42.455 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 29.81 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.727 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.386 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.647 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.125 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...he author The primary issue with the authors argument is its unsubstantiated premise...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 667, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...are already that much popular that they didnt need these programs instead they can go...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, then, thus, in conclusion, in general, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.6327345309 183% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.9520958084 131% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 11.1786427146 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 28.8173652695 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 55.5748502994 99% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 16.3942115768 134% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2236.0 2260.96107784 99% => OK
No of words: 466.0 441.139720559 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7982832618 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58880121439 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 204.123752495 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.420600858369 0.468620217663 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 720.0 705.55239521 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 19.7664670659 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 466.0 22.8473053892 2040% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 57.8364921388 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2236.0 119.503703932 1871% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 466.0 23.324526521 1998% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 107.0 5.70786347227 1875% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 6.88822355289 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124251851567 0.218282227539 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124251851567 0.0743258471296 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0701772020484 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0663567674746 0.128457276422 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497710554406 0.0628817314937 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 234.2 14.3799401198 1629% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -393.05 48.3550499002 -813% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.1628742515 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 183.8 12.197005988 1507% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.04 12.5979740519 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 29.33 8.32208582834 352% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 76.0 98.500998004 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 12.3882235529 436% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 188.4 11.1389221557 1691% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 184.0 11.9071856287 1545% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.