The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the USA between 1850 and 2000.
The bar chart illustrates that proportion of dwellers who lived isolate in different age group in USA between 1850 to 2000.
Overall,it is clear that only the three group over 37 years lived isolated in 1850 while by passing the time age group we're increased in 200. During the period of 150 years percentage increased in all kind of age group.
According to older people who represented the age group 55-64 accounted for about 3% in 1850. Before experiencing an increase significantly in 2000 to 17%, the figure stood above at 3% in 1900 and 9% in 1950. Meantime only above 2% of age group of 47.54 stayed alone afterwards it is clear increased slightly by 1% until 1950 and then it rose drastically with 13% in 2000.
During the 150 years of period, the trend which represent for age group of 37-46 went up gradually and stood at only 7% in 2000,. Regarding 17-26 and 27-36 aged people. The figure for both were not shown in 1850 since, only 17-26, aged people were not lived isolated in 1900 as well as the proportion for 27-36 age group accounted for about above 2% in 1900. Following 50 years, pattern for 27-36 age group climbed slightly to 2.2% whereas only under 2% people lived alone in 1950. There was rocket in the figure for your people and situated at 8% in 2000 compared people and situated with only 5% for 17.26 years people which was the lowest figure for the year 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... in USA between 1850 to 2000. Overall,it is clear that only the three group over...
^^^
Line 7, column 276, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... people were not lived isolated in 1900 as well as the proportion for 27-36 age group acco...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, then, well, whereas, while, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56573705179 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28686647135 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501992031873 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.109700544 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.181818182 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350722425311 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156610110965 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118007546312 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269430333471 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135016248619 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.