The bar chart below shows the results of a survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on two groups of workers; those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work perfromance.
The line graph illustrates the factors affecting the work performance of two different age groups.
A perusal of data indicates that three main reason which are responsible for the high performance of adults namely personal development, working environment and promotion prospects.
In terms of team spirit, both the age group contributed equally with 60%. While the numbers exceeded to 80% in personal enhancement for 18-30 aged group as compared to 40 % for 45-60 age people in the same category. Secondly age range of 45-60 individuals motivated by the respect from their colleagues with nearly 45% than 40% of the youngster.
On the contrast, working environment also suits for the young infants for their increasing performance as numbers rose to 100% and below 40% for older people. In respect of promotion prospect, developments for 18-30 aged people soared to 80% while the people aged more than 40 influenced less in this category. On the other hand, there was a small rise for younger people in aspect of huge salary than older ones. However, work environment did not provide any kind of change in both this group.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1027027027 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72365824875 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610810810811 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1883819211 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.888888889 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201145920742 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930214380131 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571577490229 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126781678741 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754346823841 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.