The following bar charts represents the data of electrical power generated and consumed by ten leading nations in the year of 2014.
Overall, China and the USA were the top two ones among all ten countries in the above two fields, not only generating 5398 and 4099 billon kWh electricity , but also consuming 5322 and 3866 billion kWh of that respectively. Besides, performances in the rest eight countries were ranging from 1057 to 485.1 billion kWh in production as well as the consumption within the scope between 1038 and 449 billion kMh. Furthermore, those two figures were roughly the same in Russia comparing with other ones, whereas Germany utilised slightly more energy than it produced. Finally, Korea was listed the lowest rank for its least amounts in both generation and utilisation of electricity, which showed 485.1 and 449.5 billion kWh separately .
To sum up, China and United states were leading far beyond others in the electricity production and consumption as per the chart, while Korea, REP. were the lowest level in the former sectors. As for Russia, it demonstrated almost no gap between two fields. Obviously, Germany consumed more power than its production.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lowing bar charts represents the data of electrical power generated and consumed ...
^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'billon' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'billons'.
Suggestion: billons
...elds, not only generating 5398 and 4099 billon kWh electricity , but also consuming 53...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ing 5398 and 4099 billon kWh electricity , but also consuming 5322 and 3866 billio...
^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t eight countries were ranging from 1057 to 485.1 billion kWh in production as we...
^^
Line 3, column 732, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d 485.1 and 449.5 billion kWh separately . To sum up, China and United states w...
^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Were
...ion as per the chart, while Korea, REP. were the lowest level in the former sectors....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, furthermore, so, well, whereas, while, as for, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17098445596 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69485105752 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663212435233 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.8256935067 43.030603864 216% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 124.75 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.125 5.23603664747 232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14112398899 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590393809204 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477557313056 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108295166084 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302300504 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.