In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believe the money should be spent on improving public transport.Discuss both these views

Whether investing huge capital on renovated high-speed train lines for hooking up the urban places or upgrading the existing traffic networks has triggered a series of debates among the concerning parties all over the world. From my perspective, I do consider the latter one outweighs the former.

For some proponents, they advocate that such investment may boost the local economies as well as facilitate commuters to travel to their workplaces. To begin with, new projects like this generally requires a great amount of investment. Given to this reason, building such a project could not only stimulate the increase of relating industries including steel, chemical, glass, machinery and so forth, but also encourage others like finance, tourism and more new occupations for either local dwellers or outlanders. The next point is that those who commuting across the cities might enjoy the convenience and efficiency brought in the wave of it. Because they could attribute more time saved up by high-speed trains on personal affairs, which is a huge blessing to them.

There are, however, some drawbacks shall never be ignored. On the one hand, though the above construction of infrastructures could incentivise the promotion of local economy in a short period, it is by no mean lasting for long. The investment is normally so far beyond the initial budget that it is impossible to produce enough profit so that the cost cannot be balanced. Simultaneously, ticket prices are not as affordable as those normal ones, leading to more burden on the public's shoulders.

That is why the improvement of the current transporting system is more practicable comparing with the above schemes. On the other hand, the existing technologies will definitely promote the efficiency of public transportation. For instance, utilizing virtual reality and AI can help discovery what are the main causes of the problems and provide proposals for the authorities. In this way, the relating departments will tailor optimal solutions accordingly to fully squeeze the potential of current networks. Apart from that, the cost will be considerably cheaper than investing high-speed trains. The whole project will take less time, equaling less trouble to disturb the normal routine of everyone. Furthermore, achievements will be no doubt realised without splashing huge sums of precious funds collected from the whole society, leaving no deficit on governmental account.

In conclusion, upgrading the public transport is doom to be more ideal than splashing money on high speed train rails.In the light of the above pros and cons, it is no wonder that the former decision is the preferred solution in favour of each individual around us.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...lashing money on high speed train rails.In the light of the above pros and cons, i...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, furthermore, however, may, so, well, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2294.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 430.0 315.596192385 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33488372093 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88986966382 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 176.041082164 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620930232558 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3341696286 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.736842105 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6315789474 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21052631579 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131743060476 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347670075366 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0256595979305 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0698567698613 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188788772401 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 78.4519038076 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.