In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believe the money should be spent on improving public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Increase in population requires improved, efficient and safe mode of transportation. In many countries around the World, some people consider, influx of hefty amount of money in high-speed train lines between cities is need of the hour, while others think, other transportation infrastructures should be funded for improvements. I tend to discuss both school of thoughts and share my opinion.
In the first place, people who believe that adding high-speed train lines is the solution to cope-up with challenges posed by population growth in various countries, carry a lot of weight because growing house prices near cities has pushed people further away from cities. The best possible solution for those commuters to get to work is, through high-speed trains, leaving the driving to the professionals while spending their travel in doing something productive. For instance, outskirts of Sydney or Melbourne are spread over 80 kilometers and folks trying to reach their work might have to do a round trip travelling over 150 kilometers. Express trains, make life lot easier for those travelers also reducing the number of cars on roads.
However on the other hand, people who insist on investing more on roads and other public transport are the ones living close to the city and often opt to drive, catch a taxi or use bus to reach their work. They face more traffic bottlenecks, vowing to invest in road infrastructure to add more tunnels, signal-free intersections and overhead bridges to give them a smoother run. For example, people travelling on Eastern Freeway from south-eastern suburbs of Melbourne, experience about 10 kilometers long queues at the bottleneck of Punt Road and have been calling for east-west tunnel and over-head bridge on Punt Road from last decade. So, in some cases investing on road infrastructures really become inevitable.
From my perspective, both school of thoughts carry equal weight therefore huge investments need to be made in adding more express train lines as well as developing road infrastructure. By adding more train lines would help to decrease road traffic, helping the environment as well by exhausting less toxic gases in the air and more infrastructure would help to clear worst traffic jams.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires improved" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'improving' or 'to be improved'.
Suggestion: improving; to be improved
Increase in population requires improved, efficient and safe mode of transportat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...made in adding more express train lines as well as developing road infrastructure. By addi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, really, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as, in some cases, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24166666667 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89811427622 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613888888889 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.4048090571 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.153846154 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6923076923 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7692307692 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194305832887 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624483043999 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681954833231 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120815988432 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756434691864 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.