The bar chart give information about the rate of adults of kind of age in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 to 2006

Essay topics:

The bar chart give information about the rate of adults of kind of age in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 to 2006.

Overall, it is clear that in 2005 the rate of using Internet is highest but this number is lowest in 2006. However, we can see if we look at the specific figures.
Look at the first age group. It can be seen that the rate of using Internet of 16-19 age group in 2004 and 2003 have the same figure is 80%. Meanwhile, in 2005 this number is highest among four years 100% and in 2006 is 90%. However, with the age group is 25-44, the specific figure has decreased by about two times compared the previous age group, in 2003 and 2004 about 56% and 60%, but in 2005 and 2006 had a slightly higher number is 75% and 80%.
Look at the three age group, the figure has not growth. In 2003 and 2006 is 60% and 80%, but in 2004 and 2005 have same number is 74% and 76%. By contrast, with the figure remaining two age group is 55-64 in the first three group have same number is 35% but in 2006 is 45%. Finally, the age group of 65+ is lowest among five age group about 20%. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, so it can be seen that the oldest people in the UK is not always used Internet.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'group' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'groups'.
Suggestion: groups
...o age group is 55-64 in the first three group have same number is 35% but in 2006 is ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.09589041096 4.92477711251 83% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.97666797412 2.65546596893 74% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.433789954338 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.0863872383 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5454545455 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216176131501 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934567230264 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056569109078 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161073641889 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323807705976 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 94.49 61.2550243902 154% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.5 11.4140731707 57% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.38 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.