The bar chart illustrates the number of male and female students (in thousand) in a particular university chose subjects to learn in 2005.
The bar chart illustrates the number of male and female students (in thousand) in a particular university chose subjects to learn in 2005.
Overall, more male students chose to learn sciences, mathematics, literature and law than female students, whereas social sciences, languages and the arts were chosen by more female students than their male counterparts. However, there was no difference between males and females from choosing humanities to learn in the university in 2005.
It can be seen from the chart that approximately 22 thousand of male students chose sciences to learn in the university as opposed to around 10 thousand choices of their female counterparts. Similarly, the number of male students choosing law was twice as much as female students, with the figures being 10 and 5 thousand respectively. Also, males chose literature to learn in comparison with less than 3 thousand choices of their female counterparts.
In contrast, while there were 25 thousand choices in social sciences subject are chosen by female students, their female counterparts dedicated only a half of that amount. It is clear that female students more likely than male students to choose the arts as a subject to learn, with the figures being approximately 10 and less than 5 thousand choices respectively. The biggest difference is seen in languages subject on which females chose nearly 17 thousand choices, compared with less than 5 thousand choices made by their men counterparts, whereas the number of choices on humanities subject made by males and females are the same at 11 thousand choices.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...e number of male and female students in thousand in a particular university chose subjec...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2265625 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8881746371 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.3984375 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 403.2 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.187532188 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.666666667 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4444444444 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.546474180657 0.215688989381 253% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.310103492279 0.103423049105 300% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.248701899762 0.0843802449381 295% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.491731410314 0.15604864568 315% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.294906712827 0.0819641961636 360% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.