The bar chart provides information about the income of export in one country in many categories between 2015 and 2016 and the table compares the difference in the percentage of 5 categories in 2016 with 2015.
Overall, while bar chart showed that petroleum products and engineered goods were the two most valued field in both years, the noticeable figure of table illustrates that only the percentage of value in gems and jewelry decreased in 5 separate categories
It is noticeable to note that petroleum products and engineered goods showed the highest value in export. During the period of 2015 to 2016, the expenditure of these 2 areas were relatively equal, which accounted for approximately $60 billions. Interestingly, agricultural products had exported exactly $40 billions in 2 years. while gems and jewelry accounted for a half of export earnings in 2015 and 2016, textiles only had a small contribution in income
another highlighting point is gem and jewelry was the one and only category decreased drastically in its percentage change in values. Unlike textiles, which took a big leap of 15.24%, gem and jewelry fell 5.18% of its values from 2015 to 2016. agricultural products showed the smallest increase, which was below 1%. another field that had a rise was petroleum products with the climb of exactly 3%
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...decreased in 5 separate categories It is noticeable to note that petroleum...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... It is noticeable to note that petroleum products and engineered g...
^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...exported exactly 0 billions in 2 years. while gems and jewelry accounted for a half o...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...had a small contribution in income another highlighting point is gem and je...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 13, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
...contribution in income another highlighting point is gem and jewelry w...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 258, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Agricultural
... 5.18% of its values from 2015 to 2016. agricultural products showed the smallest increase, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 330, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
... smallest increase, which was below 1%. another field that had a rise was petroleum pro...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2320441989 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88505726928 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558011049724 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 110.602801013 43.030603864 257% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 135.285714286 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.42857142857 5.23603664747 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203563204957 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821795943036 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607402056246 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136159994779 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212225680767 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.