The bar chart represents the reasons that impact productivity and efficiency at work. Summaries the information given and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart represents the reasons that impact productivity and efficiency at work. In all category, age group of people 40-60 years ahead than age group of people 25-35 years.
In first stage, considering age group 40-60 years major reason is tool and equipment in which 100 percent of worker impact because of this reason. The salary, work place condition, team work the three category where 80 percent of worker have impact because of this reason. The remaining category, fall under 40-50 percent.
In further stage, considering age group 25-35 years major reason salary in which 75 percent worker impact because of this reason. The reason of impact realistic goals, 60 percent of worker fall under this category. The supportive boss, job satisfaction and distraction where 50 percent of worker have impact because of this reason. The remaining category, fall under 20-40 percent.
In two category where both age group have equal percent of worker impact which is distraction is 50 percent and 40 percent for responsibility.
In conclusion, age group 40-60 years percent of worker have more impact than 25-35 years except for reason distraction and responsibility.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ker have impact because of this reason. The remaining category, fall under 20-40 pe...
^^^
Line 9, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reason distraction and responsibility.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, except for, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28723404255 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.601471708 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.414893617021 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7342555869 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3636363636 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0909090909 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179372360328 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116786952895 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.169326131501 0.0843802449381 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124854412561 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753549746694 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.41 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.