The bar chart shows British Emigration selected to destinations between 2004 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting and make comparisons where relevant.

The given vertical chart illustrates the information about the survey conducted by the International Passenger which shows the emigration done by the british passengers to five selected nationd during thr period of 2004 till 2007. The data is calibrated in thousands which is clearly and coherently representated.

It can be seen that tge desire of most of the british passengers was to go to Australia. During the year 2006, nearly 52000 passengers went to Australia but the emigrants had been declined in the year 2007. Moreover, in regards the number of passengers who emigrated to Spain, the number of people moved to Newzealand were quite low because only about twenty three thousands of passenger emigrated there as compared to Spain during the year 2004. Furthermore, the british passengers who emigrated to newzealand during the year: 2006 and 2007 were 21,000 and 20,000 respectively.

As far as trend was concerned, the number of emigrants to USA were about 23000 in the year 2004. After that, less people migrated there as this trend had followed the fluctuations till the year 2007. Apart from that, France is the country where 22000 people were moved during the year 2004 but it is noticeable that the number of passengers had been increased in that country at the next year.

Overall, it is evident that most of the passengers preferred to moved to Australia and least number of passengers migrated to Newzealand.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-three
...aland were quite low because only about twenty three thousands of passenger emigrated there ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: 'three thousand'.
Suggestion: three thousand
...ere quite low because only about twenty three thousands of passenger emigrated there as compared t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...out 23000 in the year 2004. After that, less people migrated there as this trend had...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, moreover, apart from, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1201.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08898305085 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75762177971 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491525423729 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.456739897 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.1 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147704373623 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639739156943 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670986449615 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941467675912 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759431506066 0.0819641961636 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.