The Bar Chart shows CO2 emissions for different form of transport in the European Union. The pie chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledges or experience.
two of different charts shows the co2 emission and percentage of funds being spent on various forms of transport in the european union. Roundly, there was correlation in the midst of both are influentially.
The first graph declared amount of co2 generated from several transportation types in the form of kilometers. Initiate from passenger cars which traveled for 130 KM. The busses less than the specified mode before, its stood at 70 kilometers and coaches spend for 40 kilometers. Therefore, maritime and rail in the conformable place which stand at 50 kilometers. Ultimately, air was in highest seat that finish at 385 kilometers.
The second diagram reveals the section of regard to grant spent on divers characterize of conveyance. The largest funds issued by european union is roads which worth 52%. Secondly, there railways use up financial for 31%. Next, public transport got through for currency of 10%. Thereafter, these three vehicles spend the identical subsidy of 1%, that are Intermodal, Inland Waterway and Airports. Lastly, likewise these two of shipment which occurred for 2%.
The consequence of representation above, european union delivered the elevated pollution from certain of transportation and how lengthy the journey goes. The most of co2 co in the air and came from pathway . However, by reason of all emit air defilement and every day people apply it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Two
two of different charts shows the co2 emiss...
^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the highest'.
Suggestion: in the highest
...d at 50 kilometers. Ultimately, air was in highest seat that finish at 385 kilometers. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... co2 co in the air and came from pathway . However, by reason of all emit air defi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, likewise, second, secondly, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27477477477 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88500816896 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 106.607317073 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662162162162 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9283446049 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.1875 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.875 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314783576389 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872935739845 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144961217605 0.0843802449381 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203551133049 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158506174105 0.0819641961636 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 61.2550243902 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.