The Bar Chart shows CO2 emissions for different form of transport in the European Union. The pie chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples

Essay topics: The Bar Chart shows CO2 emissions for different form of transport in the European Union. The pie chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledges or experience.

fachryadul92's picture

The Bar chart and Pie chart illustrated the co2 emissions which were produced by six forms of transport in the European Union (EU) as well as the percentage of eu’s fund on different forms of transport. Overall, the uppermost of co2 emissions was contributed by air which it reached more than 350 grams per passenger-km.

On the other hand, coaches were the nethermost as caused it just produced less than 50 grams per passenger-km. furthermore, the topless percentage of eu’s fund was assigned by roads, attained 52% and airports, inland waterway, and intermodal were positioned as the last priorities which it was allocated by 1%.

Furthermore, the passenger cars and busses positioned as the second and the third rank which they produced more than 100 and 50 grams per passenger-km severally. At the same time, maritime and rail contributed co2 emissions at the same level that it just attained 50 grams per passenger-km respectively.

Finally, the second priority of eu’s fund was Railways that attained 35%, and public transport as the third priority that gained 10%. However, the percentage of eu’s fund for ports and unknown transport as the fourth priorities lean-to jump down tremendously, gained 2% respectively.

Votes: 
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by other users:
Post date Users Rates More about the essay
6 months 5 days ago fadhiahelbas 84 Read full essay
More essays by this user:

Pages

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...ed less than 50 grams per passenger-km. furthermore, the topless percentage of eu's fu...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, if, second, third, well, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31313131313 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02629364389 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3157245156 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.23603664747 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193093591974 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909771158878 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141441459624 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126486988613 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138058461769 0.0819641961636 168% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Pages