The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001.
The given bar chart provides information about teaching hours in different school in four different countries in the year 2001. we can observe that U.S.A leads on the top position in the three segment primary, lower secondary and upper secondary.
Teachers spent a lot of time with student in all four countries , but firstly U.S.A teaching houers are dominating the three other countries in the three sectors with 700 and above hours in primary, 1000 houses in lower secondary and 1900 hours with upper secondry. secondly Spain complicated U.S.A by standing in second position with 600 change teaching hours in primary, 700 change in lower secondary and at last 900 teaching hours with upper secondry. Spain captured second place but statically there is a large difference between these to countrys.
Japan and Ice land had shared the last two places in primary and lower secondary sectors. Japan shows the same performance in upper secondary also, but unexpectedly Ice land shows a drastic change in upper secondary sector with 900 and above teaching hours which more than Spain. finally USA leads the top position followed by Spain and Ice land take the thread position and at last Japan stood with spending less teaching hours in three sectors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given bar chart provides information about teaching hours in diff...
^^
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...r different countries in the year 2001. we can observe that U.S.A leads on the top...
^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
... the year 2001. we can observe that U.S.A leads on the top position in the three ...
^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A lead' or simply 'leads'?
Suggestion: A lead; Leads
... the year 2001. we can observe that U.S.A leads on the top position in the three segmen...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 64, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... time with student in all four countries , but firstly U.S.A teaching houers are d...
^^
Line 2, column 82, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...in all four countries , but firstly U.S.A teaching houers are dominating the thre...
^
Line 2, column 266, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...ary and 1900 hours with upper secondry. secondly Spain complicated U.S.A by standing in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 297, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...econdry. secondly Spain complicated U.S.A by standing in second position with 600...
^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...e teaching hours which more than Spain. finally USA leads the top position followed by ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: finally,
...e teaching hours which more than Spain. finally USA leads the top position followed by ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06796116505 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40056276318 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514563106796 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0953718564 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253258206799 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126295230585 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159343889429 0.0843802449381 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205482496985 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115345645985 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.