The bar charts illustrate the average house expenses in England and its capital city – London, and to present the comparison regarding the average house prices between distinct areas of England within the year 2013.
Given are the bar charts depicting comparisons of money spent on houses in separate regions in England in 2013 and the housing fee of London and England between 1995 and 2013.
It is perceptible that London dominated the first rank of funding money into houses, while those in North Earth was much more smaller. The average domestic expense in London was outweighted those in England.
To compare London with England, there are many enormous differences between the two years. Although London possessed the number of 200000 pound in domestic fee, England was more than a half of those, about 130000 pound in the first year. But 2013 was the remarkable milestone of the breakthrough in spending money in houses of London. The number of 430000 pound was recorded in the city’s capital, while England just increased for 70000 pound in this period.
The year 2013 witnessed the dominant of London in this field, comparing with other 5 cities, none of which had the impressive number like London. This number was double compared to North West and four times than North East. Although South East, the second rank in the total and spent about 310000 pound in domestic expense, it still much smaller than London.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the bar charts depicting comparisons o...
^^^
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Given are the bar charts depicting comparisons of ...
^^
Line 2, column 122, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'smaller' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: smaller
...es, while those in North Earth was much more smaller. The average domestic expense in London...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...h London possessed the number of 200000 pound in domestic fee, England was more than ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...more than a half of those, about 130000 pound in the first year. But 2013 was the rem...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
... houses of London. The number of 430000 pound was recorded in the city’s capital, whi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
... while England just increased for 70000 pound in this period. The year 2013 witnesse...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h East, the second rank in the total and spent about 310000 pound in domestic ex...
^^
Line 4, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...econd rank in the total and spent about 310000 pound in domestic expense, it sti...
^^
Line 4, column 299, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...k in the total and spent about 310000 pound in domestic expense, it still much smal...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93137254902 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30519364131 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553921568627 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4686002162 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267439859855 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120652439773 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112291735685 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191276178359 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121223237294 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.