The bar graph shows the total manufacturing production in percentages Asia, Europe, and the rest of the world.
The given graph compares Asia, Europe, and the other part of the world in terms of the proportion of manufacturing generation in total over the course of 160 years, beginning in 1840.
It is clear that there was an overall downward trend in the figures for Asia and Europe while a reserve trend was recorded in the rest of the world. Another striking feature is that European countries had the largest proportion of the total production of manufacturing.
In 1880, Asian countries registered a significant decrease of two-fifths in the percentage of manufacturing production after ranking first at 50% in 1840. In addition, there was a mild increase of roughly 5% in the figure for Europe in 40 years’ time. In 1920, there existed a stark contrast between the percentages of the manufacturing production in Asia and Europe, with the former hitting its lowest point at 20% and the latter peaked at 50%. But at the end of the surveyed period, Europe was dwarfed by Asia with the proportion of total manufacturing generation at approximately 28%.
Regarding the rest of the world, the figure for it stood at 10% in 1840 and then rocketed to around 38%, which was its highest point during the time frame, in 1960. Forty years later, this figure fell marginally by about 5%.
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- EX 4 The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 78
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South Pole Do you agree or disagree with this development 73
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 65
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he figure for Europe in 40 years’ time. In 1920, there existed a stark contrast be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85779816514 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79253833414 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55504587156 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7492138287 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308335542997 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11375127988 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622488658547 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172857817382 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671374425285 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.