The bar graph depicts the information about the total manufacturing production in proportion an three different regions from 1840 to 2000.
After analyzing, it can be seen clearly that in 1840 Asia manufacturing production was touch peak level while, Europe on 40 per cent and least production was in Rest of the World in same year. However, in 1880 and 1920 almost identical percentage production was in the Europe, in first year Asia production was on 30 proportion and in 1920, production was decreased by 10 and again in Rest of the World manufacturing production was almost identical in both given years.
This picture further collates that in 1960, in Asia production was near about 25 proportion and next two regions manufacture ratio was identical. While, in 2000 production was in Asia near 45 per cent, Europe on about 38% and lastly Rest of The World manufacturing was on closely 32 percentile.
Overall, Europe and Asia were top in manufacturing goods whilst, Rest of the World was lowest level.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... manufacturing production in proportion an three different regions from 1840 to 20...
^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'percentile' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'percentiles'.
Suggestion: percentiles
...e World manufacturing was on closely 32 percentile. Overall, Europe and Asia were top i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the lowest'.
Suggestion: was the lowest
...cturing goods whilst, Rest of the World was lowest level.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01775147929 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8848930226 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532544378698 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.7965052669 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.333333333 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395141507999 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221754461396 0.103423049105 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051050121637 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251702901191 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255731355147 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.