Birth Rate
The graph provided reveals some similarities between Chinese and the US birth rate during the period
from 1920 to 2000.
It is evident that both countries were climbed rapidly and the highest rates of birth between 1950’s to
1955’s.
In particular, China’s birth rates increased from approximately 10 percent in 1920 to 15 percent in 1935.
Then it start decreased dramatically to 5 percent in 1940’s. The fertility in this country reaching a peak
of 20 percent in 1950s. From 1955 to 2000, the line start to declined until 2000s.
However, birth rates in US is fluctuated from 1920 to 1940 and it dropped sharply 5 percent during
1940s to 1945s. In 1950, it began to rise roughly 15 percent. Then it was dropped again until 2000.
Finally, in the graph China’s fertility is highest than US in 1930 and 1950 and the number of US birth
rates was above Chinese.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1950s'.
Suggestion: in the 1950s
... country reaching a peak of 20 percent in 1950s. From 1955 to 2000, the line start to d...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 93, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1940s'.
Suggestion: during the 1940s
...o 1940 and it dropped sharply 5 percent during 1940s to 1945s. In 1950, it began to rise rou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, so, then, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 749.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96026490066 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75911875125 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543046357616 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 195.3 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0859208472 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.9 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 3.83414634146 235% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320569332954 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130423069138 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130789799705 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166437321952 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130897182269 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.